Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro W5000

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro W5000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal +765%
10.97 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 10
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
48
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy