Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FireStream 9370

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal +315%
10.97 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2016
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 10
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1600
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102
GPU Name
Cypress
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net