NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1650MHz vs 1531MHz)
Lower TDP (85W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+159%
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
4.224 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
TITAN X Pascal
+115%
9844
Radeon Pro 5300
4558
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1280
224
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
85W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Navi 14
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
