NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

VS

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

3072 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 10 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1785MHz vs 1531MHz)

Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

TITAN X Pascal +500%

10.97 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1630

1.828 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

TITAN X Pascal +353%

9531

GeForce GTX 1630

2102

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

TITAN X Pascal +600%

42

GeForce GTX 1630

6

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

TITAN X Pascal +333%

78

GeForce GTX 1630

18

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

TITAN X Pascal +326%

128

GeForce GTX 1630

30

TITAN X Pascal

VS

GeForce GTX 1630

Graphics Card

Aug 2016

Release Date

Jun 2022

GeForce 10

Generation

GeForce 16

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz

Base Clock

1740 MHz

1531 MHz

Boost Clock

1785 MHz

1251 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

12GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5X

Memory Type

GDDR6

384bit

Memory Bus

64bit

480.4GB/s

Bandwidth

96.00GB/s

Render Config

28

SM Count

8

-

Compute Units

-

3584

Shading Units

512

224

TMUs

32

96

ROPs

16

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

3 MB

L2 Cache

1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

28.56 GPixel/s

342.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

57.12 GTexel/s

171.5 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

3.656 TFLOPS

10.97 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

1.828 TFLOPS

342.9 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

57.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP102

GPU Name

TU117

GP102-400-A1

GPU Variant

TU117-150-KA-A1

Pascal

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

16 nm

Process Size

12 nm

11.8 billion

Transistors

4.7 billion

471 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

250W

TDP

75W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (12_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

6.1

CUDA

7.5

6.4

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp

2

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs Intel Arc A750

3

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

4

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon Pro V320

5

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

6

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 12 GB

7

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA CMP 90HX

8

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon RX 7990 XTX

9

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280

10

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

Related News

1

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

2

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

3

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

4

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

5

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

6

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

7

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

8

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

9

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

10

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied