CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+1946%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
28
SM Count
27
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
216
224
TMUs
72
96
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GT200B
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
171W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
3
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs Intel Arc A750
4
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
5
AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
6
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
7
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA P106 090
8
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465
9
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon HD 7720 OEM
10
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2
Related News
1
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
2
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
3
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
5
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
6
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
7
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
8
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
9
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
10
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy