CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+2199%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal
VS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
448bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
28
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
3584
Shading Units
192
224
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
28
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GT200B
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B3
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
55 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
2
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp
3
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs Intel Arc A750
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
5
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
6
AMD Radeon HD 7470 OEM vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
7
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB
8
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
9
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI Radeon HD 3570
10
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy