NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1531MHz vs 1201MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+345%
10.97 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2.46 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 10
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1176 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
112.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1024
224
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.43 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.86 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
GM206
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
GTX 960 OEM
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
