NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

VS

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages

More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)

1536 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages

Released 5 years and 5 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1740MHz vs 1531MHz)

Lower TDP (90W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

TITAN X Pascal +53%

10.97 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

7.127 TFLOPS

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p

TITAN X Pascal +40%

42

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

30

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p

TITAN X Pascal +30%

78

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

60

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p

TITAN X Pascal +50%

128

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

85

GTA 5 2160p

TITAN X Pascal +157%

98

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

38

GTA 5 1440p

TITAN X Pascal +40%

104

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

74

GTA 5 1080p

TITAN X Pascal +70%

188

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

110

TITAN X Pascal

VS

GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Graphics Card

Aug 2016

Release Date

Jan 2022

GeForce 10

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1417 MHz

Base Clock

1545 MHz

1531 MHz

Boost Clock

1740 MHz

1251 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

12GB

Memory Size

4GB

GDDR5X

Memory Type

GDDR6

384bit

Memory Bus

128bit

480.4GB/s

Bandwidth

192.0GB/s

Render Config

-

28

SM Count

16

3584

Shading Units

2048

224

TMUs

64

96

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

64

-

RT Cores

16

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

3 MB

L2 Cache

2 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

147.0 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

55.68 GPixel/s

342.9 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

111.4 GTexel/s

171.5 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

7.127 TFLOPS

10.97 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

7.127 TFLOPS

342.9 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

111.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W

TDP

90W

600 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Power Connectors

1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GP102

GPU Name

GA107

GP102-400-A1

GPU Variant

GA107-140-A1

Pascal

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

16 nm

Process Size

8 nm

11.8 billion

Transistors

8.7 billion

471 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

6.1

CUDA

8.6

6.4

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480

2

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

3

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R7 265

4

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro S10000 Passive

5

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R9 390

6

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R9 370

7

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R7 350 640SP

8

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD FirePro RG220A

9

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View

10

NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI Radeon HD 4350

Related News

1

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

2

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

3

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

4

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

5

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

6

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

7

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

8

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

9

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

10

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU