CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
Categories
English
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
Polski
日本語
한국어
Türkçe
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano
VS
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+33%
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano
8.192 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
TITAN X Pascal
+110%
9844
Radeon R9 Nano
4677
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
TITAN X Pascal
+119%
4812
Radeon R9 Nano
2191
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2160p
TITAN X Pascal
+50%
42
Radeon R9 Nano
28
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1440p
TITAN X Pascal
+30%
78
Radeon R9 Nano
60
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1080p
TITAN X Pascal
+70%
128
Radeon R9 Nano
75
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal
VS
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 10
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
-
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Fiji
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
2
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 SE v2
3
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon HD 8670 OEM
4
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon RX 470D
5
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
6
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI FirePro V7900
7
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
8
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT
9
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon RX 580X
10
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCIe x1
Related News
1
TSMC Completes Trial Production of 2nm Process with an Impressive 90% Yield
2
Intel Confirms Nova Lake Processors, Adopting 14A Process Technology
3
NVIDIA is Preparing to Launch a Gaming Laptop APU Equivalent to the 4070
4
Is the AMD Ryzen 9000G Desktop CPU Coming Soon the Final Zen 5 Release?
5
Leaked Benchmark Data for AMD RX 9060XT Shows It Underperforming Compared to 5060Ti
6
Intel Launches the All-New Core Ultra 200 Series Processors
7
Intel Unveils Three New Xeon 6 Processors
8
AMD Officially Launches the Zen5 Series Threadripper
9
GIGABYTE Launches AI TOP ATOM Desktop Supercomputer Delivering 1000 TOPS Performance
10
Intel Official Website Unveils Arc B750 Graphics Card
© 2025 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy