NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 32GB VRAM Radeon AI PRO R9700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 91% (2920MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (644.6GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon AI PRO R9700
+336%
47.84 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Jul 2025
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1660 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
2920 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
2518 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
644.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
64
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
373.8 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
747.5 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
95.68 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.84 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1495 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
300W
600 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Navi 48
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XTW
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
4 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
53.9 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
357 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
