NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5700 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1531MHz vs 1499MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 384.0GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
+42%
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
7.675 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Aug 2020
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1243 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1499 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
40
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
2560
224
TMUs
160
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
95.94 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
239.8 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.35 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.675 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
479.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Navi 10
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 10 XTA
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
7 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
