NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 16GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W7700 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (2600MHz vs 1531MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 480.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (190W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7700
+191%
31.95 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
TITAN X Pascal
9844
Radeon PRO W7700
+59%
15693
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Nov 2023
GeForce 10
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
48
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
3072
224
TMUs
192
96
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
249.6 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
499.2 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
63.90 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.95 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
190W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Navi 32
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 32
Pascal
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
5 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
28.1 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
346 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
