NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 409.6GB/s)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1546MHz vs 1531MHz)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
TITAN X Pascal
10.97 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano
+15%
12.66 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 10
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1417 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
HBM2
384bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
480.4GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
28
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
4096
224
TMUs
256
96
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
147.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
342.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
171.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
10.97 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
342.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
175W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP102
GPU Name
Vega 10
GP102-400-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
16 nm
Process Size
14 nm
11.8 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
471 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
