Home GPU Comparison Intel UHD Graphics 16EU vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

Intel UHD Graphics 16EU vs Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 16EU and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Pro Graphics P6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel UHD Graphics 16EU 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (10W vs 15W)
Intel Iris Pro Graphics P6300 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 7% (800MHz vs 750MHz)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 16EU
0.192 TFLOPS
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 +219%
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2021
Release Date
Sep 2014
HD Graphics-M
Generation
HD Graphics-W
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

350 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
750 MHz
Boost Clock
800 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
128
Shading Units
384
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
6
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

3.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
384.0 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
48.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Jasper Lake GT1
GPU Name
Broadwell GT3e
-
GPU Variant
-
Generation 11.0
Architecture
Generation 8.0
Intel
Foundry
Intel
10 nm+
Process Size
14 nm
Unknown
Transistors
Unknown
Unknown
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

10W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.0
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy