Home GPU Comparison Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD FirePro A320

Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD FirePro A320

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 600 and 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel UHD Graphics 600 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (5W vs 100W)
AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (955MHz vs 650MHz)
288 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
UHD Graphics 600
0.125 TFLOPS
FirePro A320 +486%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
HD Graphics-T
Generation
Trinity
Integrated
Type
Integrated
Ring Bus
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

200 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
650 MHz
Boost Clock
955 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
96
Shading Units
384
12
TMUs
24
2
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.300 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.640 GPixel/s
7.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.92 GTexel/s
249.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
124.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
733.4 GFLOPS
31.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

5W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Gemini Lake GT1
GPU Name
Devastator
-
GPU Variant
A320
Generation 9.5
Architecture
TeraScale 3
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
32 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.303 billion
Unknown
Die Size
246 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy