Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 90W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 's Advantages
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2020
Voodoo4-2
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
143 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
2
TMUs
56
2
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
TU106
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
TU106-125-KAB-A1
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
-
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy