Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 130W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2013
Voodoo4-2
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
143 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1152
2
TMUs
96
2
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
GK104
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
12 (11_0)
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy