Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI325X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 750W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI325X 's Advantages
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (288GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
19456 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2024
Voodoo4-2
Generation
Radeon Instinct(MIx)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
143 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
288GB
DDR
Memory Type
HBM3e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
19456
2
TMUs
1216
2
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
750W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
-
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
153 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
N/A
1.1
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy