Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 AGP and 20GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock3000MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (800.0GB/s vs 2.288GB/s)
5376 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
Voodoo4-2
Generation
Navi III
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
3000 MHz
143 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
320bit
2.288GB/s
Bandwidth
800.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
84
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
5376
2
TMUs
336
2
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
84
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
80 MB

Theoretical Performance

286.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
576.0 GPixel/s
286.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
1008 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
129.0 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
64.51 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.016 TFLOPS

Board Design

15W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
Navi 31
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
Navi 31 XT+
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy