Home GPU Comparison 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2013
Voodoo4-2
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
166 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

16MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
2.656GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
-
Shading Units
1792
2
TMUs
112
2
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

332.0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
332.0 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
-
FP32 (float)
2.867 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
716.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

VSA-101
GPU Name
Tahiti
Daytona (355-0025-221)
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO (215-0821056)
Voodoo Scalable
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.014 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
112 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Board Design

15W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

6.0
DirectX
12 (11_1)
1.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
-
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy