Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 250 vs A16 PCIe

GeForce GTS 250 vs A16 PCIe

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 and 16GB VRAM A16 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 250 Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
A16 PCIe Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (231.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 250
387
A16 PCIe +1021%
4339
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1812 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
231.9GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
10
128
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.24 GPixel/s
44.93 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.339 TFLOPS
387.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.339 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G92B
GPU Name
GA107
G92-428-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
Unknown
260 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy