Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

GeForce GTS 450 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.73GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 106W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 +1778%
601
ATI Radeon HD 2400
32
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Feb 2008
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.84 GFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

106W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
RV610
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy