Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs FirePro W7000

GeForce GTS 450 vs FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Lower TDP (106W vs 150W)
FirePro W7000 Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450
601
FirePro W7000 +304%
2432
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 400
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL


(215-0828073)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy