Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison GeForce GTS 450 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

GeForce GTS 450 vs GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTS 450 Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (106W vs 171W)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 57.73GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTS 450 +12%
601
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
536
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2010
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 400
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

902 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
57.73GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
27
192
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB

Theoretical Performance

6.264 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
25.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
601.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
50.11 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

106W
TDP
171W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GT200B
GF106-250-KA-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy