CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
VS
HiSilicon Kirin 985
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2580MHz HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs. 8 cores 2960MHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.
Main Differences
HiSilicon Kirin 985 Advantages
Released 1 years late
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 Advantages
Better graphics card performance FLOPS (1.0368 TFLOPS vs 0.652 TFLOPS )
Larger memory bandwidth (34.13GB/s vs 34.1GB/s)
Higher Frequency (2960MHz vs 2580MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
HiSilicon Kirin 985
652
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
+58%
1036
HiSilicon Kirin 985
VS
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
CPU
1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76
3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55
Architecture
1x 2.96 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime)
3x 2.42 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)
2580 MHz
Frequency
2960 MHz
8
Cores
8
ARMv8.2-A
Instruction set
ARMv8.2-A
-
L2 cache
1 MB
-
L3 cache
0
7 nm
Process
7 nm
-
Transistor count
6.7
6 W
TDP
6 W
-
Manufacturing
Samsung
Graphics
Mali-G77 MP8
GPU name
Adreno 640
700 MHz
GPU frequency
675 MHz
8
Execution units
2
128
Shading units
384
12
Max size
16
0.652 TFLOPS
FLOPS
1.0368 TFLOPS
1.1
Vulkan version
1.1
2.0
OpenCL version
2.0
12
DirectX version
12.1
Memory
LPDDR4X
Memory type
LPDDR4X
2133 MHz
Memory frequency
2133 MHz
4x 16 Bit
Bus
4x 16 Bit
34.1 Gbit/s
Max bandwidth
34.13 Gbit/s
Multimedia (ISP)
是
Neural processor (NPU)
Hexagon 690
UFS 2.1, UFS 3.0
Storage type
UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
3120 x 1440
Max display resolution
3840 x 2160
1x 48MP, 2x 20MP
Max camera resolution
1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
4K at 30FPS
Video capture
4K at 120FPS
4K at 30FPS
Video playback
8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
Video codecs
H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Audio codecs
AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Balong 5000
Modem
X24 LTE, X50 5G
Connectivity
LTE Cat. 22
4G support
LTE Cat. 20
是
5G support
Yes
Up to 1277 Mbps
Download speed
Up to 5000 Mbps
Up to 177 Mbps
Upload speed
Up to 1240 Mbps
5
Wi-Fi
6
5.0
Bluetooth
5.1
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Navigation
GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS
Info
Apr 2020
Announced
Apr 2019
Flagship
Class
Flagship
Hi6290
Model number
SM8150-AC
-
Official page
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
Related SoC Comparison
1
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs Samsung Exynos 980
2
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
3
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
4
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
5
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs MediaTek Helio G99
6
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs MediaTek Helio G95
8
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs Apple A15 Bionic
9
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
10
HiSilicon Kirin 985 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy