Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs A10 PCIe

Quadro K1200 vs A10 PCIe

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
A10 PCIe Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1695MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
A10 PCIe +2614%
31240
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
A10 PCIe +2746%
2505
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
72
512
Shading Units
9216
32
TMUs
288
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA102
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy