Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Data Center GPU Max 1550

Quadro K1200 vs Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 600W)
Data Center GPU Max 1550 Advantages
Released 8 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1600MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
15872 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +4455%
52430
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

512
Shading Units
16384
32
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
600W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
100 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy