Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

Quadro K1200 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (2100MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
14080 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
AMD Instinct MI300A +10551%
122600
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
512
Shading Units
14592
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
760W
200 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
MI300
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
146 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy