Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Tesla X2090

Quadro K1200 vs Tesla X2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
Tesla X2090 Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Tesla X2090 +15%
1332
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF110
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy