Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Data Center GPU Flex 170

Quadro K1200 vs Data Center GPU Flex 170

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (2050MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +1358%
16790
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1950 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
262.4 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
524.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
33.59 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.79 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
DG2-512
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy