Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs GRID K240Q

Quadro K1200 vs GRID K240Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K240Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
GRID K240Q Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
GRID K240Q +98%
2289
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

512
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy