Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro 400

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro 400

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
464 additional rendering cores
Quadro 400 Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +965%
1151
Quadro 400
108
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
48
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT216
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy