Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro K5200

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 46% (1124MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)
Quadro K5200 Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Quadro K5200 +208%
3553
Blender
Quadro K1200
88
Quadro K5200 +232%
293
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy