Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Quadro NVS 160M

Quadro K1200 vs Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Released 6 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
504 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 160M Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 45W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +4904%
1151
Quadro NVS 160M
23
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
512
Shading Units
8
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

45W
TDP
12W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G98
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy