Home Mobile and Tablet SoC Comparison Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Instinct MI60

Quadro K1200 vs Radeon Instinct MI60

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Quadro K1200 Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI60 Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 60% (1800MHz vs 1124MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1024GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1151
Radeon Instinct MI60 +1181%
14750
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
1024GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
512
Shading Units
4096
32
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.373 TFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Vega 20
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 20 GL
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 5.1
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
13.23 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
331 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related SoC Comparison

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy