Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

VS

Samsung Exynos 2200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

We compared two versions of phone SoCs: 8 cores 2800MHz Samsung Exynos 2200 vs. 8 cores 1800MHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption, and more.

Main Differences

Samsung Exynos 2200 Advantages

Better graphics card performance FLOPS (3.1104 TFLOPS vs 0.1843 TFLOPS )

Larger memory bandwidth (51.2GB/s vs 5.3GB/s)

Higher Frequency (2800MHz vs 1800MHz)

More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)

Released 4 years and 3 months late

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 Advantages

Lower TDP (5W vs 7W)

Score

Benchmark

AnTuTu 10

Samsung Exynos 2200 +317%

920435

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

220696

Geekbench 6 Single Core

Samsung Exynos 2200 +440%

1594

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

295

Geekbench 6 Multi Core

Samsung Exynos 2200 +238%

3685

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

1088

FP32 (float)

Samsung Exynos 2200 +1590%

3110

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

184

Samsung Exynos 2200

VS

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

CPU

1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X2
3x 2.52 GHz – Cortex-A710
4x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A510

Architecture

4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)
4x 1.6 GHz – Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)

2800 MHz

Frequency

1800 MHz

8

Cores

8

4 nm

Process

14 nm

-

Transistor count

2

7 W

TDP

5 W

Samsung

Manufacturing

Samsung

Graphics

Samsung Xclipse 920

GPU name

Adreno 509

810 MHz

GPU frequency

720 MHz

3

Execution units

1

640

Shading units

128

24

Max size

8

3.1104 TFLOPS

FLOPS

0.1843 TFLOPS

1.1

Vulkan version

1.0

2.0

OpenCL version

2.0

12

DirectX version

11

Memory

LPDDR5

Memory type

LPDDR4

3200 MHz

Memory frequency

1333 MHz

4x 16 Bit

Bus

2x 16 Bit

51.2 Gbit/s

Max bandwidth

5.3 Gbit/s

AI

Yes

NPU

Hexagon 680

Multimedia (ISP)

Yes

Neural processor (NPU)

Hexagon 680

UFS 3.1

Storage type

eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1

3840 x 2160

Max display resolution

1900 x 1200

1x 200MP

Max camera resolution

1x 24MP, 2x 16MP

8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS

Video capture

4K at 30FPS

8K at 60FPS, 4K at 240FPS

Video playback

4K at 30FPS

H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9

Video codecs

H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9

AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Audio codecs

AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV

Exynos 5300

Modem

X12

Connectivity

LTE Cat. 24

4G support

LTE Cat. 13

Yes

5G support

No

Up to 7350 Mbps

Download speed

Up to 600 Mbps

Up to 3670 Mbps

Upload speed

Up to 150 Mbps

6

Wi-Fi

5

5.2

Bluetooth

5.0

GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC

Navigation

GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS

Info

Jan 2022

Announced

Oct 2017

Flagship

Class

Mid range

S5E9925

Model number

SDM636

Samsung Exynos 2200

Official page

Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

Related SoC Comparison

1

Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Samsung Exynos 2200

2

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3

3

MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Samsung Exynos 2200

4

Google Tensor G3 vs Samsung Exynos 2200

5

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 1380

6

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 2400

7

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

8

Samsung Exynos 1480 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636

9

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Samsung Exynos 7885

10

Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U