Home Comparison AMD EPYC 7642 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

AMD EPYC 7642 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7290F

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 7642 with 48 cores 2.4GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7290F with 72 cores 1.5GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 7642 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.4GHz vs 1.5GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (7nm vs 14nm)
Lower TDP (225W vs 260W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Aug 2019
Release Date
Jun 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Rome
Core Architecture
Knights Landing
AMD Socket SP3
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 2 (Rome))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)

Package

3.8 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
7 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
225 W
Power Consumption
260 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
74 mm²
Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.7 GHz
48
Total Core Count
72
96
Total Thread Count
288
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
15.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR4-3200
Memory Types
DDR4
8
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

4
PCIe Version
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy