Home Comparison AMD EPYC 8434P vs Centaur CHA

AMD EPYC 8434P vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 8434P with 48 cores 2.5GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 8434P 's Advantages
Released 122 years and 8 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.5GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 200W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Sep 2023
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
200 W
Power Consumption
70 W
75 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4x73 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
48
Total Core Count
8
96
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
6
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
96
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy