AMD EPYC 9015 vs Opteron X2 170
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9015 with 8 cores 3.6GHz and Opteron X2 170 with 2 cores 2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9015 's Advantages
Released 19 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (3.6GHz vs 2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 90nm)
Opteron X2 170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 125W)
Score
General Parameters
Oct 2024
Release Date
Aug 2005
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Denmark
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket 939
N/A
Integrated Graphics
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Opteron X2 (Denmark)
Package
16.63 billions
Transistor Count
0.233 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
125 W
Power Consumption
110 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
65 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
2x70.6 mm²
Die Size
199 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
8
Performance Cores
-
16
Performance Core Threads
-
3.6 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
8
Total Core Count
2
16
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
36.0
Multiplier
10.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
128 KB
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR1-400
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
