Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Platinum 8260M

AMD EPYC 9174F vs Xeon Platinum 8260M

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9174F with 16 cores 4.1GHz and Xeon Platinum 8260M with 24 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9174F 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (4.1GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 35.75MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 14nm)
Xeon Platinum 8260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (165W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9174F +64%
2311
Xeon Platinum 8260M
1406
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9174F
13296
Xeon Platinum 8260M +3%
13703
VS

General Parameters

Nov 2022
Release Date
Dec 2018
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Cascade Lake-SP
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Platinum(Cascade Lake-SP)

Package

52.56 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
165 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x72 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

4.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
16
Total Core Count
24
32
Total Thread Count
48
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
41.0
Multiplier
24.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
35.75 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
8

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy