Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9175F vs Opteron 4386

AMD EPYC 9175F vs Opteron 4386

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9175F with 16 cores 4.2GHz and Opteron 4386 with 8 cores 3.1GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9175F 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (4.2GHz vs 3.1GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (512MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 32nm)
Opteron 4386 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 320W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Dec 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Seoul
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket C32
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Seoul)

Package

133.04 billions
Transistor Count
1.2 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
95 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
16x70.6 mm²
Die Size
315 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

16
Performance Cores
-
32
Performance Core Threads
-
4.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
16
Total Core Count
8
32
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
42.0
Multiplier
15.5
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
384 K
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
8 MB
512 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy