Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9384X vs Centaur CHA

AMD EPYC 9384X vs Centaur CHA

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 122 years and 5 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (768MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 320W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9384X +175%
2169
Centaur CHA
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9384X +333%
17274
Centaur CHA
3982
VS

General Parameters

Jun 2023
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Genoa-X
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
CHA (CNS)

Package

90.16 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
70 W
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
8x72 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
32
Total Core Count
8
64
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.5
Multiplier
12.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
768 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
12
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
44

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy