AMD EPYC 9384X vs Intel Xeon Phi 5120D
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9384X with 32 cores 3.1GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 5120D with 60 cores 1.053GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC 9384X 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.1GHz vs 1.053GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 5120D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (245W vs 320W)
Score
General Parameters
Jun 2023
Release Date
Jun 2013
AMD
Manufacturer
SFF
Server
Type
Server
Genoa-X
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
SFF 230-Pin
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)
Package
90.16 billions
Transistor Count
5 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
245 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x72 mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
3.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.053 GHz
3.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
32
Total Core Count
60
64
Total Thread Count
240
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
25.5
Multiplier
10.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
768 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-
