Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9475F vs Opteron 8216 (F3)

AMD EPYC 9475F vs Opteron 8216 (F3)

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9475F with 48 cores 3.65GHz and Opteron 8216 (F3) with 2 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9475F 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 667)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 1)
Higher base frequency (3.65GHz vs 2.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 90nm)
Opteron 8216 (F3) 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 400W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Aug 2006
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Santa Rosa
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket F
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Santa Rosa)

Package

66.52 billions
Transistor Count
0.227 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
90 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
95 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
235 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

48
Performance Cores
-
96
Performance Core Threads
-
3.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
4.8 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
48
Total Core Count
2
96
Total Thread Count
2
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
36.5
Multiplier
12.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
128 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
8

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR2-667
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
1
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy