Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9575F vs Intel Xeon Phi 7250

AMD EPYC 9575F vs Intel Xeon Phi 7250

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9575F with 64 cores 3.3GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7250 with 68 cores 1.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9575F 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (3.3GHz vs 1.4GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 14nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 7250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (215W vs 400W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jun 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Knights Landing
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 3647
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5 (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Landing)

Package

66.52 billions
Transistor Count
8 billions
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
14 nm
400 W
Power Consumption
215 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
8x70.6 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

64
Performance Cores
-
128
Performance Core Threads
-
3.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
5 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
1.6 GHz
64
Total Core Count
68
128
Total Thread Count
272
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
33.0
Multiplier
14.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR4
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy