Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9645 vs Opteron A1120

AMD EPYC 9645 vs Opteron A1120

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9645 with 96 cores 2.3GHz and Opteron A1120 with 4 cores 1.7GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9645 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 1866)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.3GHz vs 1.7GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (256MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 28nm)
Opteron A1120 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 320W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Jan 2016
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Seattle
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
AMD Socket SP1
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Opteron (Seattle)

Package

Transistor Count
-
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
28 nm
320 W
Power Consumption
25 W
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
mm²
Die Size
182 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

96
Performance Cores
-
192
Performance Core Threads
-
2.3 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
96
Total Core Count
4
192
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
23.0
Multiplier
17.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
80 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
2 MB shared
256 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4-1866
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
2
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
3
128
PCIe Lanes
8

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy