Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9654 vs Xeon X3430

AMD EPYC 9654 vs Xeon X3430

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Xeon X3430 with 4 cores 2.4GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9654 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 1333)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 2)
Larger L3 cache size (384MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 45nm)
Xeon X3430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 360W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Nov 2022
Release Date
Sep 2009
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Lynnfield
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 1156
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon(Lynnfield)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
0.774 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
45 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
95 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12x72 mm²
Die Size
296 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
96
Total Core Count
4
192
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
133 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
18.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3-1333
12
Max Memory Channels
2
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
2
128
PCIe Lanes
16

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy