Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9654 vs Xeon X5365

AMD EPYC 9654 vs Xeon X5365

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9654 with 96 cores 2.4GHz and Xeon X5365 with 4 cores 3GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9654 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 65nm)
Xeon X5365 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (3GHz vs 2.4GHz)
Lower TDP (150W vs 360W)

Score

Benchmark

Geekbench 6 Single Core
AMD EPYC 9654 +521%
1984
Xeon X5365
319
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
AMD EPYC 9654 +1266%
19940
Xeon X5365
1459
VS

General Parameters

Nov 2022
Release Date
Aug 2007
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Genoa
Core Architecture
Clovertown
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
Intel Socket 771
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Generation
Xeon (Clovertown)

Package

78.84 billions
Transistor Count
0.582 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
65 nm
360 W
Power Consumption
150 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
63 °C
TSMC
Foundry
-
12x72 mm²
Die Size
2x143 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

2.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
96
Total Core Count
4
192
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
333 MHz
24.0
Multiplier
9.0
64 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per die
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
2

Memory Parameters

DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR2, DDR3
12
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

5
PCIe Version
0
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy