Home Comparison AMD EPYC 9825 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7110X

AMD EPYC 9825 vs Intel Xeon Phi 7110X

We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC 9825 with 144 cores 2.2GHz and Intel Xeon Phi 7110X with 61 cores 1.25GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.

Main Differences

AMD EPYC 9825 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 11 months late
Higher specification of memory (6000 vs 4)
Higher base frequency (2.2GHz vs 1.25GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (3nm vs 22nm)
Intel Xeon Phi 7110X 's Advantages
Lower TDP (300W vs 390W)

Score

VS

General Parameters

Oct 2024
Release Date
Nov 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
PCIe
Server
Type
Server
Turin
Core Architecture
Knights Corner
AMD Socket SP5
Socket
PCIe x16
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 5c (Turin))
Generation
Xeon Phi (Knights Corner)

Package

Transistor Count
5 billions
3 nm
Manufacturing Process
22 nm
390 W
Power Consumption
300 W
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
mm²
Die Size
350 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
mm²
I/O Die Size
-

CPU Performance

144
Performance Cores
-
288
Performance Core Threads
-
2.2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.25 GHz
3.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
0
144
Total Core Count
61
288
Total Thread Count
244
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
12.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
32 K per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
512 K per core
384 MB shared
L3 Cache
-
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1

Memory Parameters

DDR5-6000
Memory Types
DDR3,DDR4
6 TB
Max Memory Size
-
12
Max Memory Channels
576 GB/s
Max Memory Bandwidth
-
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes

Miscellaneous

Official Website
-
5
PCIe Version
-
128
PCIe Lanes
-

Related CPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy