AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 vs Centaur CHA
We compared two server CPUs: AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 with 4 cores 2.1GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101 's Advantages
Released 117 years and 1 months late
Higher base frequency (2.1GHz vs 1.2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (14nm vs 16nm)
Lower TDP (35W vs 70W)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Higher specification of memory (3200 vs 2666)
Larger L3 cache size (16MB vs 8MB)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 5 Single Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
+48%
755
Centaur CHA
508
Geekbench 5 Multi Core
AMD EPYC Embedded 3101
2709
Centaur CHA
+24%
3379
General Parameters
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Zen
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD BGA SP4r2
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC Embedded (Zen (Snowy Owl))
Generation
CHA (CNS)
Package
4.8 billions
Transistor Count
-
14 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
35 W
Power Consumption
70 W
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
213 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
CPU Performance
2.1 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
4
Total Core Count
8
4
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
21.0
Multiplier
12.0
96 K per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
512 K per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
8 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR4-2666
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
3
PCIe Version
3
32
PCIe Lanes
44
